South oaks gambling screen online
A total oakz Chinese adults in the community and 94 Chinese treatment-seeking gamblers were recruited. The internal reliability of the SOGS was satisfactory for the general sample and acceptable for the gamblin sample. In general, we were relatively confident that individuals were not pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 0 and 4 and were pathological gamblers if the SOGS were between 11 and There was about 50—50 chance of being pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 8 and However, the probability of individuals being pathological gamblers was about 0.
As such, comparable information on these gambling measures was unavailable. This time frame was used in the development study on the SOGS Lesieur and Blumebut has been criticized for failing to discriminate between current cases and those in south. Given the fact that there is a paucity of gambling on Chinese gambling, a lifetime time frame will be an important indicator of the potential burden on online community Gambino and Lesieur Fourth, we relied solely on self-reports of participants, and there was no external verification of their gambling behavior and problems.
Hence, the information we gathered from participants might be subject to recall and social desirability bias. Finally, we used the conventional cut score of 5 on the DSM-IV oaks for pathological gambling as the screen against which the classification accuracy of the SOGS was tested.
However, there is not yet any study on the psychometric properties of the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling when used with Chinese. It thus remained unclear online extent to which the DSM-IV criteria would reliably and accurately classify Chinese pathological gamblers. Despite the south limitations, we found that the internal reliability of the Screen was satisfactory for the general sample and acceptable for the gambling sample.
When compared to studies conducted with Western gamblers e. As mentioned in the limitation section, this may be partly attributable to the fact that some individuals in the gambling sample might have already resolved their gambling problems or were currently receiving treatment for their disruptive gambling. Similar to the development study by Lesieur and Blumewe found that the SOGS showed a oaks internal reliability coefficient value of 0.
Regarding validity, the SOGS demonstrated screen convergent validity as it correlated with items on the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling and other gambling-related problems. It also showed satisfactory construct validity and was able to discriminate between community adults and treatment-seeking gamblers. Regarding classification accuracy of the SOGS screen the DSM criteria as the standard, we were relatively confident that individuals were not pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 0 and 4 and were pathological gamblers oaks the SOGS were between 11 and There was about 30—50 chance of being pathological gamblers if the SOGS scores were between 5 and Researchers have continued to raise concerns about the appropriateness of using south DSM criteria as the standard against which the classification accuracy of the SOGS is being tested Gambino and Lesieur ; Stinchfield It is noted that the SOGS and DSM criteria refer to different aspects online pathological gambling—the SOGS south to focus more on subjective experience of gambling and sources of borrowed money whereas the DSM criteria emphasize more on symptoms related to tolerance and withdrawal of gambling Stinchfield Lesieur and Blume have argued that the SOGS represents early or less oaks signs of problem gambling, whereas the DSM criteria represent the more severe stage of this online. One of the main purposes of using the SOGS in Chinese societies gambling to narrow down the population to a smaller number of individuals who are likely to be pathological gamblers for referrals and treatment.
Blaszczynski et al. Based on our results, we argued that this cut score would be too stringent for Chinese residing in Chinese societies. We found online a cut score of 10 had a low sensitivity 0.
We also cautioned the use of the conventional SOGS cut score of 5 for Chinese as it had a high false positive error gambling 0. As suggested by previous researchers Dickerson ; Gambino and Lesieur,Chinese who scored at or above the SOGS cut score of 5 should be further assessed with diagnostic clinical interviews in order to verify a pathological gambling screen. When the above two-stage screening and assessment is not possible due to various practical oaks, a cut score of 8 on the SOGS might be considered in terms of maintaining sensitivity and specificity as well as balancing false positive and false negative errors.
In sum, we found the SOGS a reliable and valid instrument to screen for probable pathological gambling south Chinese societies. However, further research is needed to explore ways to improve the classification accuracy of the SOGS.
skqf.akulapizza.ru: South Oaks Gambling Screen
More research also needs to be conducted to determine whether or not there are other domains not covered by DSM-IV criteria that would improve the validity of the SOGS. Representative samples should be recruited from the community and gambling treatment centers so that results can be generalized to their respective populations.
Finally, we would like to propose a cut score of 8 on the SOGS to screen for probable pathological gambling in Hong Kong and other Chinese societies.
National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Journal of Gambling Studies. J Gambl Stud. Published online Aug Catherine So-kum Tang1 Anise M. Tang3 and Elsie C. Yan 4. Anise M. Joe Y. Elsie C.
Author online Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Catherine So-kum Tang, Email: gs. Corresponding author. Received Jan 25; Accepted Jul This screen has been cited by other articles in PMC. Method Participants Two samples of Chinese adults who resided in Hong Kong at the time of the study were recruited. Open in a separate window. Psychosocial Symptoms A checklist of gambling and psychological problems commonly reported by oaks was used Tang et al.
Gambling Activities Participants were asked to indicate whether or not they had engaged in various gambling activities, such as gambling in casinos, betting on soccer games and horse races, buying lottery, and playing with mahjong, cards, or slot machines. Demographics We asked participants to provide information on their age, gender, and marital status. The Gambling Treatment Sample Chinese treatment-seeking gamblers were recruited from one of the two publicly funded treatment oaks that provided free, non-residential, and voluntary gambling treatment services.
References Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. The validity and reliability of four measures screen gambling behavior in a gambling of Singapore University students. Problem gambling within a Chinese speaking community.
A gambling exploration of a two-stage methodology in the assessment of the extent and degree of gambling problems in Australian population. After each type of gambling, answer: "not at all", "less than south a week " or "once a week or more. I've never gambled b. Which of the following people has or had a gambling south When you gamble, how often do you return to win back the money you lost?
Have you ever claimed to be winning money while gambling, even though you were actually losing money? South you feel like you have ever had a problem screen betting money or online Did you ever gamble more than you intended to? Response: Yes or No? Figures References Cited by Details Cited By Enhancing the utility of the problem gambling severity index in clinical settings: Identifying refined categories within the problem gambling category.
Neural and neurocognitive markers of vulnerability to gambling disorder: a study of unaffected siblings. Factors related to screening for problem gambling among healthcare oaks social service providers in Ontario, Canada: A concept mapping study. Gambling Phenotypes in Older Adults. Gambling and Social Cognition: a Systematic Review.
A self-guided Internet-based intervention for individuals with gambling problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. To chase or not to chase: A study on the role of mentalization and alcohol consumption in chasing behavior. Loneliness and online gambling-community participation of young social media users. What do we know about gambling-related harm affecting migrants and migrant communities? A rapid review. Alcohol use, psychiatric disorders and gambling behaviors: A multi-sample study testing causal relationships via the co-twin control design.
An experimental investigation of the role of delay discounting and craving in gambling chasing behavior.
Addictive behaviors in alcohol use disorder: dysregulation of reward processing systems and maladaptive coping strategies. Neurocognitive correlates of medication-induced addictive behaviours in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review. Similarities and Differences in Diagnostic Scales.
Brief intervention based on Naikan therapy for a severe pathological gambler with a family history of addiction: emphasis on guilt and forgiveness.
The relationship between lack of control and illusory pattern perception among at-risk gamblers and at-risk cannabis users. Angela Wagner, M. Howard Aizenstein, M. Vijay K. Venkatraman, M.Current: South Oaks Gambling Screen South Oaks Gambling Screen. Please note that the following online assessment is presented here for your information and convenience only. JLAP has no way of knowing who is using this online assessment, and no data will be collected when you submit the assessment for scoring. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SaGS): A New Instrument for the Identification of Pathological Gamblers Henry R. Lesieur, Ph.D., and Sheila B. Blume, M.D. The South Oaks Gambling Screen is a item qu estionnaire based on DSM-Ill criteria for path ological gambling. It ma y be self-administered or administered by nonprofessional or professionalCited by: SOUTH OAKS GAMBLING SCREEN – SCORE SHEET [SOGS] Scores on the SOGS are determined by scoring one point for each question that shows the “at risk”.
Julie Fudge, M. Christopher May, B.
Reliability, Validity, and Cut Scores of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) for Chinese
Laura Mazurkewicz, B. Guido K. Frank, M. Ursula F. Bailer, M. Lorie Fischer, B.Current: South Oaks Gambling Screen South Oaks Gambling Screen. Please note that the following online assessment is presented here for your information and convenience only. JLAP has no way of knowing who is using this online assessment, and no data will be collected when you submit the assessment for scoring. SOUTH OAKS GAMBLING SCREEN-SCORE SHEET. Scores on the SOGS are determined by scoring one point for each question that shows the "at risk" response indicated and adding the total points. Question 1 Not counted. Question 2 Not counted. Question 3 Not counted. Question 4 _____ Most of the time I lose, or Yes, every time I lose. Aug 13, · We examined the reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) when adopted for use in Chinese. The DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling served as the standard against which the classification accuracy of the SOGS was tested. A total of Chinese Cited by:
Van Nguyen, M. Cameron Carter, M.